Comments on: Released SEO No Duplicate Version 0.2 http://omninoggin.com/wordpress-posts/released-seo-no-duplicate-version-02/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=released-seo-no-duplicate-version-02 WordPress and Web Dev From the Ground Up Wed, 16 May 2012 09:51:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: redwall_hphttp://omninoggin.com/wordpress-posts/released-seo-no-duplicate-version-02/#comment-1929 redwall_hp Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:47:30 +0000 http://omninoggin.com/?p=455#comment-1929 That's what I use too, but I normally start at 1.0.0. Then I up the second digit for the major releases, the third digit for bug fixes. The first digit will change after a "major architectural change" or when the second digit surpasses 9, whichever happens first. That's what I use too, but I normally start at 1.0.0. Then I up the second digit for the major releases, the third digit for bug fixes. The first digit will change after a "major architectural change" or when the second digit surpasses 9, whichever happens first.

]]> By: Thaya Kareesonhttp://omninoggin.com/wordpress-posts/released-seo-no-duplicate-version-02/#comment-1925 Thaya Kareeson Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:22:54 +0000 http://omninoggin.com/?p=455#comment-1925 :) I like the x.x.x version system. 1st digit for major architectural changes 2nd digit for enhancements 3rd digit for bug fixes :) I like the x.x.x version system.
1st digit for major architectural changes
2nd digit for enhancements
3rd digit for bug fixes

]]> By: redwall_hphttp://omninoggin.com/wordpress-posts/released-seo-no-duplicate-version-02/#comment-1924 redwall_hp Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:13:27 +0000 http://omninoggin.com/?p=455#comment-1924 0.2... Would that make it a beta? :) Nice to see you've implemented my suggestion, as well as Yoast's. I may have to move to this instead of the code snippet you had in your original post about Canonical URLs. 0.2… Would that make it a beta? :)

Nice to see you've implemented my suggestion, as well as Yoast's. I may have to move to this instead of the code snippet you had in your original post about Canonical URLs.

]]>